Skip to main content
← All templatesPreview: Chambers
Use this template →
[email protected](202) 555-0187Washington, DC
Forensic Economics & Antitrust Analysis
Marlowe Research Group
Economist · Expert Witness

A quantitative witness, retained
for complex economic matters.

“The economic analysis must be right the first time — and hold up the second.”

Evelyn R. Marlowe, PhD
Director · Economist
The Economist

An introduction.

Dr. Marlowe An economist retained by trial counsel to value damages, assess class certification, and rebut opposing expert testimony in antitrust, class action, and regulatory matters.

Twenty-plus years estimating classwide damages and competitive effects. Deposition-tested across federal and state courts. Industries from pharmaceuticals and medical devices to energy, CPG, and finance.

Education: PhD, Economics, Carnegie Mellon University (2005); MA, Economics, Carnegie Mellon University (2003); BA, Mathematics & Economics, Swarthmore College (1998).

20+
Years of practice
60+
Retained engagements
12
Industries served
15+
Depositions & reports
Areas of Practice

Four pillars of counsel.

01

Antitrust & Competition

Market definition, monopoly power, price fixing, vertical restraints, and merger effects — on both sides of the v.

Market definition · Monopoly & monopsony · Price fixing · Mergers & acquisitions · Vertical restraints
02

Class Certification

Econometric and statistical analysis addressing predominance, common impact, and classwide damages methodologies.

Common impact · Predominance analysis · Classwide damages models · Rebuttal of opposing experts
03

Economic Damages

Lost profits, overcharge, unjust enrichment, and Lanham Act damages — modeled to withstand Daubert.

Lost profits · Overcharge damages · Lanham Act · Patent damages · Breach of contract
04

Public Policy & Regulation

Economic-impact studies and white papers for regulatory proceedings, legislative initiatives, and trade associations.

Regulatory impact · Tax policy · Infrastructure · White papers · Ballot initiatives
Representative Matters

Selected engagements.

2023
Federal antitrust — generic pharmaceuticals
Class certification and classwide damages analysis in an opt-out antitrust matter.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
2022
Class action — financial services overdraft fees
Estimated classwide economic damages from allegedly excessive fee practices.
U.S. District Court, D.C.
2023
Commercial dispute — building products industry
Market-power and damages analysis in a commercial dispute between manufacturers.
State court, Ohio
2022
Lanham Act — false advertising
Lost-sales damages model presented in mediation; matter resolved.
Confidential mediation
2021
Merger review — consumer food products
Post-merger economic analysis; inquiry closed without further investigation.
Federal agency, non-public
2023
Regulatory — zero-emission vehicle policy
Economic impact of ZEV policies on dedicated highway infrastructure funding.
State DOT / policy brief
Credentials

Education, honors & service.

Education
PhD, Economics
Carnegie Mellon University, 2005
MA, Economics
Carnegie Mellon University, 2003
BA, Mathematics & Economics
Swarthmore College, 1998
Recognition
Forensic Economist of the Year — National Association of Forensic Economics
2021
Who’s Who Legal: Competition — Economists & Consulting Experts
2019 – 2023
Editorial Board, Journal of Competition Economics
2017 – Present
Associate Editor, Litigation Economics Review
2020 – Present
Affiliations
American Economic Association
National Association of Forensic Economics
American Bar Association (Antitrust Law Section — Associate)
Referee — Journal of Industrial Economics, Review of Law & Economics
In their words

What counsel say.

A patient, careful economist. Her analysis held up under aggressive cross and moved the needle at mediation.

Lead counsel, federal antitrust class action
Am Law 100 firm

I’ve retained her three times. She translates hard econometrics into something a judge — and a jury — can actually follow.

Partner, trial practice
Regional defense firm

Rigorous, prompt, and refreshingly candid about what the data can and cannot say. That’s the expert I want on my side of the v.

General counsel
Mid-cap pharmaceutical
Engagement

Frequently asked.

How does an engagement typically begin?

With a complimentary 30-minute call under privilege to understand the matter, parties, and timeline. If a conflict check clears within 48 hours, we move to an engagement letter and retainer.

What are your fees?

Rates vary by the nature of the engagement and the anticipated scope. A written fee schedule is shared after the initial conflict check; retainers are estimated against a preliminary work plan.

How do you handle conflicts?

Every prospective engagement runs through a full conflict check against our current and prior matters before substantive work begins.

What is your availability?

I am currently accepting a limited number of engagements for Q2 and Q3 of 2026. Please note any deposition or trial deadlines when reaching out.

Can you provide a sample report?

Redacted excerpts are available upon request once a conflict check has cleared and, where appropriate, a non-disclosure agreement is in place.

Retain

Request an initial consultation.

Conflict checks are completed within 48 hours. Initial calls are complimentary and held under privilege.

Marlowe Research Group
Washington, DC
Office
1200 K Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20005
Contact
(202) 555-0187
© 2026 · All rights reserved.
Powered by Exlitem