--- title: "Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict" meta: "og:description": "A Los Angeles jury awarded $3.3M to Ulrike Zillner but found her 65% at fault, splitting liability with Maple Street HOA and Ross Morgan & Co." "og:title": "Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict" description: "A Los Angeles jury awarded $3.3M to Ulrike Zillner but found her 65% at fault, splitting liability with Maple Street HOA and Ross Morgan & Co." --- September 25, 2025 # **Jury Splits Fault in $3.3M Burbank Injury Verdict** A Los Angeles jury awarded $3.3M to Ulrike Zillner but found her 65% at fault, splitting liability with Maple Street HOA and Ross Morgan & Co. [**Premises Liability**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/jury-verdict/category/premises-liability) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) ### **Outline** Author ![](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/profile_images/shared_image_1.webp) **Sohini Chakraborty****Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.** ![Article Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/default_1.webp) In Los Angeles, a jury on August 18, 2025, reached a split verdict in Ulrike Zillner’s personal injury lawsuit against Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association and Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. Zillner claimed unsafe property conditions caused her severe injuries and lasting harm. The jury found both defendants negligent assigning 30% fault to Ross Morgan and 5% to Maple Street HOA while holding Zillner herself 65% responsible. Damages totaled $3,335,000.12, including $935,000 for future medical expenses, $550,000 for past pain and suffering, and $1,850,000 for future noneconomic losses. After apportioning fault, her recovery was significantly reduced. The verdict underscores how comparative negligence can dramatically affect awards in premises liability cases. ## **Case Background** In a civil trial that concluded in a Los Angeles Courtroom, a jury delivered a split verdict in a personal injury case, finding both the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared responsibility for the harm she suffered. The case was filed by Ulrike Zillner against two companies: Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association and Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. The lawsuit, which had been filed on May 19, 2020, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, alleged that Ms. Zillner was hurt on a property that the two Defendants were responsible for maintaining. The complaint contended that the Defendants had a duty to keep the premises safe for residents and visitors. Ms. Zillner, the Plaintiff, claimed that the Defendants failed to uphold that duty and that their negligence was the direct cause of her injuries and losses. The case proceeded to a jury trial where both sides presented their arguments and evidence. ### **Cause** The lawsuit stated that Ms. Zillner's injuries happened because of a negligent or careless condition on the property that the Defendants managed. The complaint did not specify the exact nature of the dangerous condition. However, it broadly alleged that the Defendants had control over the property's upkeep and that they did not manage it responsibly. The Plaintiff argued that the Defendants' failure to take action created an unsafe environment, which then led to her harm. ### **Injury** As a result of the incident, Ms. Zillner suffered what she described as severe and permanent injuries. The complaint claimed that she endured substantial physical, mental, and emotional pain and suffering. Her ability to carry out her normal daily activities was affected, and she was prevented from performing her usual job. The complaint also stated that she faced an unknown duration of lost income because of her inability to work. ### **Damages Sought** Ms. Zillner sought financial compensation for all of her injuries and losses. She asked the jury to award her what are known as "general damages" for her pain and suffering, and "special damages" to cover her medical bills and the income she lost from being unable to work. She also requested any other relief the Court deemed appropriate. The case went to trial with a demand for a jury to decide on the amount of damages. ## **Key Arguments and Proceedings** ### **Legal Representation** **Plaintiff(s):** Ulrike Zillner · **Counsel for Plaintiff(s):** Daniel K. Kramer | Teresa A. Johnson | Kenneth Lipton | William N. Matthews | Brandon C. Salumbides | Taylor S. Kruse · **Experts for Plaintiff(s):** [Mark Burns](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Mark-Burns/1557415) | [Daniel Franc](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Daniel-Franc/1544773) | [Manon Kwon](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Manon-Kwon/1568405) | [Michael Marvi](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Michael-Marvi/1568406) | [Natalie Zhitnitsky](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Natalie-Zhitnitsky/1568407) **Defendant(s):** Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association | Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. - **Counsel for Defendant(s):** John A Delis - **Experts for Defendant(s):** [Mark Blanchette](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Mark-Blanchette/1533528) | [Paul Kaloostian](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Paul-Kaloostian/1528530) | [Davi Lechuga](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/David-Lechuga/1532169) | [Kasra Maasumi](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Kasra-Maasumi/1568408) | [Gregory H. Tchejeyan](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Gregory-Tchejeyan/1568127) ## **Key Arguments or Remarks by Counsel** During the trial, the lawyers for each side argued their respective positions. The jury had heard from both the Plaintiff and the Defendants about what each party thought happened on the day of the incident. ### **Claims** The Plaintiff’s claim of negligence was the central focus of the lawsuit. The complaint laid out a series of accusations, with the core argument being that the Defendants had a legal responsibility to keep the property safe. Ms. Zillner claimed that the Defendants had fallen short of this duty in several ways, which directly resulted in her injuries. - **Failure to Maintain Safe Property:** The Plaintiff’s claim of premises liability asserted that the Defendants had failed to use and maintain the property in a reasonably safe manner. - **Failure to Inspect and Warn:** Ms. Zillner further claimed that the Defendants had a duty to inspect the property to find any unsafe conditions. She alleged that they either knew about the danger or should have known about it and failed to fix it or warn her about it. - **Negligent Supervision and Hiring:** The lawsuit also included claims of negligent supervision and hiring, suggesting the Defendants did not properly oversee any agents, employees, or contractors they had hired to work on the property. ### **Defense** While the defense's specific arguments were not outlined in the provided documents, the special verdict form clearly showed the jury had considered the issue of the Plaintiff’s own actions. The defense had argued that Ms. Zillner was, to some degree, responsible for her own injuries. The verdict form indicates that the defense successfully convinced the jury of this point. The jury was asked if the Plaintiff’s own negligence was a substantial factor in causing her harm, and they answered “yes.” This finding would prove crucial in the final calculation of damages. ### **Jury Verdict** The jury had reached a decision. On August 18, 2025, the jury delivered a special verdict form that outlined their findings in detail. They found that both Defendants Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. and the Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association were negligent in the use or maintenance of the property. The jury also concluded that the negligence of both Defendants was a substantial factor in causing Ms. Zillner's harm. The jury did not, however, place all the blame on the Defendants. They also found that the Plaintiff, Ulrike Zillner, was negligent and that her own negligence was also a substantial factor in causing her harm. The jury then proceeded to award damages, as follows: · Future medical expenses as: $935,000 · Past noneconomic loss, including physical pain, mental suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, physical impairment, inconvenience, grief, anxiety, humiliation, and emotional distress damages amounting to $ 550,000 · Future noneconomic loss, including physical pain, mental suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, physical impairment, inconvenience, grief, anxiety, humiliation, and emotional distress amounting to $1,850,000 The jury's form listed the total damages as $3,335,000.12. Finally, the jury determined the percentage of responsibility for the Plaintiff’s harm. They assigned 30% of the blame to Ross Morgan & Company, Inc. and 5% to the Maple Street Burbank Homeowners Association. The jury found that the remaining 65% of the responsibility for the harm belonged to the Plaintiff, Ulrike Zillner. The percentages had added up to 100%. Court documents are available upon request at [jurimatic@exlitem.com](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/mailto:jurimatic@exlitem.com) [Share with Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict) [Share with X](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict&text=x) [Share with LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict) [Share with Email](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/mailto:?body=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict&subject=email) [Share with WhatsApp](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict%20whatsapp) ### **Find your next Expert Witness today** ![Sanjay Adhia](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **Sanjay Adhia** Forensic Psychiastry ![George Reis](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **George Reis** Forensic Imaging ![Maria Babinetz](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-splits-fault-in-33m-burbank-injury-verdict/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **Maria Babinetz** Vocational Rehabilitation Find and retain experts without brokerage or upcharge. ### Looking for more? Join our subscriber community and receive regular updates delivered straight to your inbox. It’s quick, easy, and free.