--- title: "Jury Awards $735K in SK Invest vs. FFI Renovation Dispute" meta: "og:description": "SK Invest Group wins $735K verdict against FFI and Genin for fraud, breach of contract, and misrepresentation in a Florida renovation case." "og:title": "Jury Awards $735K in SK Invest vs. FFI Renovation Dispute" description: "SK Invest Group wins $735K verdict against FFI and Genin for fraud, breach of contract, and misrepresentation in a Florida renovation case." --- June 26, 2025 # **Jury Awards $735K in SK Invest vs. FFI Renovation Dispute** SK Invest Group wins $735K verdict against FFI and Genin for fraud, breach of contract, and misrepresentation in a Florida renovation case. [**Breach of Contract**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/jury-verdict/category/breach-of-contract-jury-verdicts-settlements) [**Fraud**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/jury-verdict/category/fraud) ### **Outline** Author ![](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/profile_images/shared_image_1.webp) **Sohini Chakraborty****Sohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.** ![Article Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/default_1.webp) A Florida jury awarded SK Invest Group $735,610 after finding First Florida International (FFI) and owner Edward Genin liable for charging for work never performed, breaching contract, and committing fraud in a renovation project. ## ** Case Background** This case came out of a renovation project at 240 Ocean Blvd., Golden Beach, Florida. SK Invest Group, LLC sued First Florida International, LLC (FFI) and Edward Genin, claiming that FFI and Genin acted fraudulently and violated their contract. According to SK Invest, FFI promised quality work and charged $270,000 for services that were never performed or were done poorly. SK Invest said that despite making payments, the work was delayed and misrepresented, costing the company money and causing long‑term financial losses. ### **The cause that led to the dispute** SK Invest claimed that FFI and Genin had failed to honour their agreement. The company said that the Defendants created false work orders, charged for work never performed, and used payments for other projects. SK Invest also stated that FFI and Genin violated warranty terms and engaged in unfair and deceptive practices. ### **Injuries suffered** SK Invest suffered significant financial losses. The delays meant the property was unavailable for rental. The company also claimed that the quality of work was deficient and violated applicable building codes. This caused long‑term damage and lost income. ### **Damages sought** SK Invest sought actual damages for breach of contract, breach of warranty, fraud, and misrepresentation. The Plaintiff also requested recovery for unjust enrichment and statutory penalties. ### **Key Arguments and Proceedings** **Plaintiff’s Position** SK Invest argued that FFI and Genin acted with fraud and failed to fulfil their obligations. The Plaintiff stated that work was charged for but never performed, and that payments were used for unrelated expenses. **Defense Position** FFI and Genin denied the claims, stating that they acted within the agreement and contested the nature of the delays and deficiencies. They argued that SK Invest failed to prove that payments were used improperly or that the work was incomplete. ### **Legal Representation** **Plaintiff:**SK Invest Group, LLC · **Counsel for Plaintiff:** David E. Wolff **Defendants:**First Florida International, LLC and Edward Genin · **Counsel for Defendants:** Lewis Lerman ### **Claims Asserted** **Breach of Contract Against FFI and Genin** SK Invest argued that FFI and Genin failed to honour their agreement for renovations. **Unjust Enrichment Against FFI and Genin** The Plaintiff claimed FFI and Genin kept payments for work not performed. **Breach of Warranty Against FFI and Genin** The Plaintiff stated that the quality and timing of work violated express and implied warranties. **Negligent and Fraudulent Misrepresentation Against Genin** The Plaintiff argued that Genin intentionally gave false estimates and charged for work never conducted. **FDUTPA and Fraud Claims Against FFI and Genin** SK Invest stated that the Defendants engaged in unfair and deceptive practices, making misrepresentations that induced payments. ### **Defense Arguments** FFI and Genin argued that payments were applied appropriately and that any delays were due to external circumstances. They contested the assertion that their work violated any agreement or warranty. ### **Jury Verdict** The jury found in favour of SK Invest Group, LLC. They ruled that FFI failed to honour the agreement, Genin acted with fraud and misrepresentation, and both Defendants engaged in unfair and deceptive practices. The jury awarded $735,610 to SK Invest Group for damages caused by the breach of contract and misrepresentations. The verdict underscored the seriousness of charging for work not performed and making false statements to secure payments. #### **Court Documents** [Complaint](https://www2.miamidadeclerk.gov/ocs/ImgViewerWF.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlIiih%2bgqiU8rawLJW%2bj4E30XGWoN6L%2b82TliipSPQtwPVRFQJ0yk5ZShY5%2bWXEsY95ZoTKGuwuISfWzJr1Ed1L5%2f8EuSpHbH6YOku663lpeWyT%2bsva3GgOVQehqigK9ymR4tu0aRZoAcA8AOxs62KbJTMpqYmAId3%2bmd9CY3VQDt3X%2bONG6E77YnYuDudpoP6eSWRYJz42XFGd1l66jWExpDEykytWKRe87xYIWnKetC3StoBxT%2fqgUWydi0EwwfjfoSKYtvHjFOC%2fTMPuqHvhvw1n0rui2HcFVEc%2f37IUMwzA%3d%3d) [Jury Verdict](https://www2.miamidadeclerk.gov/ocs/ImgViewerWF.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlIiih%2bgqiU8rawLJW%2bj4E30XGWoN6L%2b82TmR0BNOdb%2b%2fJNJQDZEgPfa0K1H4CmkK8gRWtUo6X3DgS8DCC2I8i7UtdF26xCLNkphTrO31QqO%2fy5gbzZuzBKoi3xCCTm1N0tO51jLPErDVdMJAnnUMHpWHiTQMem6aKOVQJXr1WRX8HtLkYVKTsi58f9tIHOHUk7W%2b%2fcJDIcsEmbRc2bVYhGEwTJzZqYTjHdZ2cyldzy%2b9QUdist5UtnwKFLvJcx1Jo6iW2zUJ5BveKdoVneYoEJRqAFQmPQkShw2SYdHM4WE0Yuw8T7rNRfrwAID5nMb7OLc%3d) [Share with Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute) [Share with X](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute&text=x) [Share with LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute) [Share with Email](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/mailto:?body=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute&subject=email) [Share with WhatsApp](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute%20whatsapp) ### **Find your next Expert Witness today** ![Sanjay Adhia](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **Sanjay Adhia** Forensic Psychiastry ![George Reis](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **George Reis** Forensic Imaging ![Maria Babinetz](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/jury-awards-735k-in-sk-invest-vs-ffi-renovation-dispute/_ipx/q_80/user-default.svg) ###### **Maria Babinetz** Vocational Rehabilitation Find and retain experts without brokerage or upcharge. ### Looking for more? Join our subscriber community and receive regular updates delivered straight to your inbox. It’s quick, easy, and free.