February 27, 2026

Duncan v. CT Transit: Jury Rules on New Haven Bus Accident

A New Haven jury returned a verdict for the defense in a lawsuit filed by Sherlette Duncan, who claimed spinal injuries from a 2022 bus and BMW collision.

Author
Sohini ChakrabortySohini Chakraborty is a lawyer, with over two years of experience in legal research and analysis. She specializes in working closely with expert witnesses, offering critical support in preparing legal research and detailed case studies.

On August 3, 2022, Sherlette Duncan traveled as a passenger on a city bus heading northbound on Broadway Street in New Haven. The trip took a violent turn when a BMW, operated by Chiara Corazzini, collided with the bus while attempting to parallel park. Duncan alleged that the impact caused her body to jerk and twist, resulting in debilitating injuries to her lower back and legs, including sciatica and a misalignment of her spinal discs. Duncan subsequently filed a lawsuit against the Connecticut Transit District Consortium and the owners of the BMW, claiming the bus driver failed to maintain a safe lookout and that the transit authority breached its duty to provide the highest degree of care to its passengers. The defense countered by questioning the specific involvement of the transit district and the extent of the negligence alleged. After a full trial in the New Haven Superior Court, the jury found in favor of the Defendants, concluding that the Plaintiff was not entitled to the monetary damages she sought for her medical expenses and pain and suffering.

Case Background

Sherlette Duncan, a resident of Connecticut, filed a lawsuit following a motor vehicle accident that took place on August 3, 2022, in New Haven. The incident occurred around 5:00 PM while Duncan traveled as a passenger on a city bus heading northbound on Broadway Street.

Cause

The legal action arose when a sudden and abrupt collision occurred between the city bus and a BMW vehicle. The driver of the BMW, Chiara Corazzini, had attempted to parallel park on Broadway Street when the two vehicles collided. Duncan claimed that this impact caused her body to twist and jerk violently, leading to significant physical trauma.

Injury

Duncan reported sustaining various serious personal injuries to her back and legs. Her medical complaints included acute and chronic lower back pain, right-sided sciatica, and bilateral lower back pain. She also suffered from stiffness, a limited range of motion, and altered body mechanics. A post-traumatic misalignment of her spinal discs and muscles, known as increased lumbar lordosis, was also documented.

Damages Sought

In her complaint, Duncan sought several forms of relief from the Court. She demanded monetary damages for her physical injuries, pain and suffering, and the loss of enjoyment of life. Additionally, she requested compensation for hospitalizations, medical treatments, diagnostic scans, and lost wages resulting from the accident.

Key Arguments and Proceedings

Plaintiff(s): Sherlette Duncan.

  • Counsel for Plaintiff(s): John M. Spielman

Defendant(s): Connecticut Transit District Consortium | Andrea Corazzini | Chiara Corazzini.

  • Counsel for Defendant(s): Ronald D. Williams, Jr.

Key Arguments or Remarks by Counsel

Claims

Duncan’s legal team argued that the Greater New Haven Transit District (GNHTD) failed in its duty as a common carrier to provide the highest degree of care for its passengers. They alleged the bus driver lacked proper control and failed to steer the vehicle safely to avoid the collision. Furthermore, the Plaintiff claimed that Chiara Corazzini had been negligent by failing to keep a proper lookout and making an unsafe movement while trying to park.

Defense

The Transit District contested the claims by asserting that they were not responsible for the accident. In their formal answer, they admitted that Duncan was a passenger on a "CT Transit bus" but denied that she was on a "Greater New Haven Transit District bus" at the exact time of the accident. They maintained that the bus was operated in a reasonable manner and that the fault lay elsewhere.

Jury Verdict

The trial concluded on September 24, 2025, before Honorable William F. Clark. After hearing the evidence presented by both sides regarding the collision on Broadway Street, the jury reached a decision.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendants. Specifically, the foreperson, Patricio Moschcovich, signed the verdict forms stating that the jury found the issues in favor of the Connecticut Transit District and against the Plaintiff, Sherlette Duncan. Following the jury's decision, the Court entered a final judgment for the Defendants on September 24, 2025, meaning the Plaintiff did not recover the damages she had sought in her complaint.

Court Documents

Complaint

Jury Verdict

Find your next Expert Witness today

Sanjay Adhia
Sanjay Adhia

Forensic Psychiastry

George Reis
George Reis

Forensic Imaging

Maria Babinetz
Maria Babinetz

Vocational Rehabilitation

Find and retain experts without brokerage or upcharge.

Looking for more?

Join our subscriber community and receive regular updates delivered straight to your inbox. It’s quick, easy, and free.