--- title: "Medical Malpractice | Jury Verdict | Blog | Exlitem" meta: "og:title": "Medical Malpractice | Jury Verdict | Blog | Exlitem" --- Jury Verdict Categories ### **Jury Verdict Articles** Explore jury verdict articles and case studies. ## **Search** ## **Filters** [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/HOWE_DEBORAH.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/medical-malpractice-defense-victory-in-orange-county) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) March 18, 2026 ###### [Medical Malpractice Defense Victory in Orange County](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/medical-malpractice-defense-victory-in-orange-county) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/medical-malpractice-defense-victory-in-orange-county) Following a 2022 medical procedure, Deborah Howe alleged that the medical team at Gastroenterology Associates of Central Florida failed to recognize and treat a bile duct injury in a timely manner. Despite evidence of abdominal fluid and persistent pain following an ERCP, the Plaintiff claimed that the attending physicians delayed necessary drainage and antibiotic care, leading to permanent internal damage. However, after a full trial in the Ninth Judicial Circuit, the Court issued a final judgment in February 2026, ruling that the Plaintiff would take nothing from the action and entering a complete victory for the healthcare providers. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/CLARK_IV_WALTER.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/misdiagnosis-of-brain-bleed-leads-to-life-altering-injury) [**Negligence**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/negligence) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) March 13, 2026 ###### [Misdiagnosis of Brain Bleed Leads to Life-Altering Injury](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/misdiagnosis-of-brain-bleed-leads-to-life-altering-injury) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/misdiagnosis-of-brain-bleed-leads-to-life-altering-injury) Jennifer Clark visited a Yale New Haven Hospital satellite emergency room with a sudden, "thunderclap" headache and severe hypertension. Although medical staff noted a suspected brain hemorrhage on her chart, they failed to order an immediate scan and instead administered a migraine medication that is known to worsen internal bleeding. This delay and medication error allegedly caused a minor 4mm bleed to expand into a catastrophic, permanent brain injury, leaving Ms. Clark with profound cognitive deficits and a loss of life’s enjoyments. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/MATTHEW_J_LAWRENCE.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-medical-malpractice-ct-scan-negligence-verdict) [**Negligence**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/negligence) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) March 12, 2026 ###### [Florida Medical Malpractice: CT Scan Negligence Verdict](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-medical-malpractice-ct-scan-negligence-verdict) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-medical-malpractice-ct-scan-negligence-verdict) The Estate of John R. Lawrence filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida and several physicians following his death from a bowel perforation in early 2022. The Plaintiff alleged that a radiologist failed to properly interpret a CT scan, missing critical signs of vascular compromise and imminent perforation. While the defense maintained that the medical care met professional standards, the litigation moved toward a jury trial to determine the liability of the treating physicians. On February 13, 2026, the jury delivered a verdict assessing negligence and awarding damages for the loss of companionship and mental pain and suffering endured by the decedent’s surviving spouse. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/JESSICA_TOWLES1.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-842k-in-brain-injury-facility-abuse-case) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) March 6, 2026 ###### [Jury Awards $842k in Brain Injury Facility Abuse Case](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-842k-in-brain-injury-facility-abuse-case) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-842k-in-brain-injury-facility-abuse-case) Following a catastrophic ten-story fall that resulted in a traumatic brain injury, Gabriel Reeves sought refuge and recovery at the Brooks Brain Injury Clubhouse. Instead of a safe haven, he encountered Eric Powell, a volunteer who used his position of trust to orchestrate a scheme of sexual exploitation. Under the pretense of helping Gabriel lose weight, Powell lured him into private offices to take nude "progress photos" and sent him sexually explicit messages. This betrayal shattered Gabriel's recovery, triggering severe behavioral setbacks, physical aggression, and a diagnosis of PTSD. While the facility argued these actions were outside their control, a Duval County jury held them responsible for the conduct of their apparent agent, awarding significant damages for the lifelong care Gabriel will now require. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/MICHAELA_NIELSEN.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-doctor-wins-defense-verdict-in-obgyn-lawsuit) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) March 4, 2026 ###### [Florida Doctor Wins Defense Verdict in OB/GYN Lawsuit](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-doctor-wins-defense-verdict-in-obgyn-lawsuit) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/florida-doctor-wins-defense-verdict-in-obgyn-lawsuit) In May 2020, Michaela Nielsen underwent a vaginal delivery at HCA Florida Kendall Hospital under the care of Dr. Eric Runyon. Following the birth, Ms. Nielsen alleged that she suffered a significant clitoral and labial laceration that the medical team failed to diagnose or repair. The Plaintiff contended that this oversight led to physical disfigurement and required multiple corrective surgeries. However, the defense maintained that Dr. Runyon provided appropriate care and that the injury was not a result of medical negligence. After a multi-day trial in the 11th Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, the jury returned a complete defense verdict, finding that Dr. Runyon was not negligent in his treatment of the Plaintiff. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/DEBORAH_HIGER.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/physician-wins-no-damages-in-dignity-health-bias-lawsuit) [**Employment Discrimination**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/employment-discrimination-labor-and-employment-law) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) February 20, 2026 ###### [Physician Wins No Damages in Dignity Health Bias Lawsuit](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/physician-wins-no-damages-in-dignity-health-bias-lawsuit) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/physician-wins-no-damages-in-dignity-health-bias-lawsuit) Dr. Deborah Higer, a veteran physician in Mount Shasta, filed a sweeping lawsuit against Dignity Health and fellow doctors David Holst and Ronald Lagro, alleging a two-decade campaign of discrimination. Dr. Higer, who is a lesbian, claimed the hospital environment became increasingly hostile after she reported a colleague’s alleged misconduct and advocated for patient safety. She argued that the hospital retaliated by stripping her of clinical privileges and removing her from pediatric call schedules, causing severe financial and emotional damage. However, upon reviewing the evidence, a San Francisco jury determined that while Dr. Higer did provide services under contract, she had not been subjected to harassing conduct based on her gender or sexual orientation. Consequently, the Court found no liability against the Defendants on the harassment claims. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/KENWORTHY.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/fragrance-allergy-workplace-discrimination-case-ends-in-ct) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) February 18, 2026 ###### [Fragrance Allergy Workplace Discrimination Case Ends in CT](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/fragrance-allergy-workplace-discrimination-case-ends-in-ct) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/fragrance-allergy-workplace-discrimination-case-ends-in-ct) Alicia Kenworthy, a Medical Assistant at Franklin Medical Group, suffered from chronic, severe allergies and life-threatening asthma triggered by workplace fragrances. Despite providing medical documentation and personal supplies for a "fragrance-free" environment, Kenworthy experienced multiple anaphylactic reactions, leading to an emergency room visit. She alleged that her coworker continued using scented products and that management failed to intervene, ultimately terminating her employment due to absences caused by her condition. While the jury acknowledged her disability and the medical necessity of her requests, they weighed whether the company's disciplinary actions constituted a material breach of employment law. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/Ho_vs_Kureshi.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/181m-verdict-for-surgical-negligence-and-stroke) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) February 4, 2026 ###### [$18.1M Verdict for Surgical Negligence and Stroke](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/181m-verdict-for-surgical-negligence-and-stroke) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/181m-verdict-for-surgical-negligence-and-stroke) The legal battle began after what was supposed to be a routine medical procedure at Sharp Memorial Hospital on January 26, 2023. Phuong Ho sought treatment for a benign pituitary tumor. Her neurosurgeon, Dr. Sohaib Kureshi, recommended surgical removal, and the team utilized a computer guidance system to navigate the delicate area near the brain. However, during the operation, the surgical instruments struck Ms. Ho’s carotid artery. This catastrophic error immediately triggered a severe stroke, fundamentally altering her life. The surgical accident left Ms. Ho with permanent and profound physical and cognitive disabilities. She emerged from the procedure with impaired speech and restricted physical movement, including paralysis and spasticity on the right side of her body. Simple tasks like gripping or holding objects became impossible. Beyond the physical limitations, she suffered from aphasia, memory loss, and significantly diminished cognitive abilities. On December 18, 2025, a San Diego jury found Dr. Sohaib Kureshi negligent. The jury determined his actions were a substantial factor in causing the harm and awarded total damages of $18,056,888 to Ms. Ho and her husband for medical expenses, lost earnings, and loss of consortium. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/JAMES_DOHERTY.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-6m-in-nursing-home-elder-abuse-death-case) [**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) January 22, 2026 ###### [Jury Awards $6M in Nursing Home Elder Abuse Death Case](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-6m-in-nursing-home-elder-abuse-death-case) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-awards-6m-in-nursing-home-elder-abuse-death-case) A California jury awarded $6 million in punitive damages to the family of James Doherty, a 72-year-old cancer patient who died after developing a severe infected pressure ulcer at Alameda Healthcare & Wellness Center. The verdict found the skilled nursing facility and its management company liable for neglecting basic care requirements, including failing to reposition the bedridden patient regularly. Staff missed up to 37% of required repositioning sessions despite knowing Doherty was at high risk for skin breakdown. His wound progressed from minor skin damage to a stage IV pressure ulcer that caused fatal sepsis. [![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/SOMMERS_ALEXANDER.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-rules-for-yale-new-haven-in-eye-misdiagnosis-lawsuit) [**Medical Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice) [**Professional Liability **](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/professional-liability-) January 14, 2026 ###### [Jury Rules for Yale New Haven in Eye Misdiagnosis Lawsuit](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-rules-for-yale-new-haven-in-eye-misdiagnosis-lawsuit) [](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/medical-malpractice/jury-verdict/jury-rules-for-yale-new-haven-in-eye-misdiagnosis-lawsuit) This medical malpractice lawsuit arose from a series of clinical encounters beginning in October 2019. Alexander R. Sommers, a resident of North Haven, sought treatment for sudden visual impairments in his right eye, describing a shadow like an "eclipse" blocking his vision. The plaintiff alleged that healthcare providers at Yale New Haven Health and the Yale Eye Center failed to timely and accurately diagnose a retinal detachment, initially misidentifying the issue as a neurological condition. This delay allegedly led to permanent and disabling damage, including a severe MRSA infection following eventual surgery. The defense maintained that the medical team acted appropriately based on the clinical information available at the time. Following a trial in November 2025, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, finding no liability for the hospital or the individual physicians. 1 2 3 ... 9