---
title: "Jury Verdict | Blog | Exlitem"
meta:
  "og:title": " Jury Verdict | Blog | Exlitem"
---

Jury Verdict Categories

### **Jury Verdict Articles**

Explore jury verdict articles and case studies.

## **Search**

## **Filters**

[![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/PAVANO_PAOLO.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/-pavano-v-anderson-204k-jury-verdict-in-legal-malpractice)

[**Trademark Infringement**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/trademark-infringement) [**Legal Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice)

January 28, 2026

###### [Pavano v. Anderson: $204K Jury Verdict in Legal Malpractice](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/-pavano-v-anderson-204k-jury-verdict-in-legal-malpractice)

[](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/-pavano-v-anderson-204k-jury-verdict-in-legal-malpractice)

In a significant victory for professional accountability, a Torrington jury found that Attorney William Anderson and his associated law firms failed to meet the standard of care required in a trademark litigation matter. The dispute began when Paolo Pavano hired Anderson in 2018 to protect his business, "Paul's Cutting Edge Lawn Care," from infringement. However, the underlying lawsuit was dismissed in 2021 after a series of procedural errors, including allegations that the attorneys failed to sue the correct parties or bring the action in the proper Court. While the defense argued they had acted appropriately, the jury ultimately sided with the Plaintiffs, awarding over $204,000 in damages to compensate for the lost legal opportunity.

[![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/POLLARD_MICHELLE1.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/350k-verdict-in-pollard-v-sodipo-legal-malpractice-case)

[**Personal Injury**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/personal-injury) [**Legal Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice)

December 23, 2025

###### [$350K Verdict in Pollard v. Sodipo Legal Malpractice Case](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/350k-verdict-in-pollard-v-sodipo-legal-malpractice-case)

[](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/350k-verdict-in-pollard-v-sodipo-legal-malpractice-case)

A Hartford Superior Court jury awarded Michelle Pollard $350,000 in economic damages after finding that her former attorney John Sodipo and Sodipo Law Group, P.C. committed legal malpractice. Pollard hired Sodipo to represent her following a 2012 rear-end collision, but he failed to file a timely underinsured motorist claim against GEICO, leaving her unable to recover additional compensation for her injuries.

[![Card Image](https://media.jurimatic.com/cdn-cgi/image/q=70/images/default_1.webp)](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/brown-v-mcgoldrick-ct-lawyer-fee-dispute-verdict)

[**Contract**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/contract) [**Legal Malpractice**](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice)

September 3, 2025

###### [Brown v. McGoldrick: CT Lawyer Fee Dispute Verdict](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/brown-v-mcgoldrick-ct-lawyer-fee-dispute-verdict)

[](https://exlitem.com/jury-verdict/category/legal-malpractice/jury-verdict/brown-v-mcgoldrick-ct-lawyer-fee-dispute-verdict)